Experience Placement Convention — Positional Restriction on a Generic Descriptor

This document specifies requirements for experience placement convention in professional and quasi-professional written communication.

It applies to the opening paragraph of candidate materials and application responses.

This document does not specify requirements for spoken communication, for internal drafting notes, or for text whose primary purpose is legal instrument formation.

The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes requirements of this document.

For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document applies.

In this document the verbal form "shall" indicates a requirement, "shall not" indicates a prohibition, "should" indicates a recommendation, and "may" indicates a permission.

Terms and definitions given in SQLBL 1000 and the following apply.

3.1 opening paragraph — first prose paragraph following any heading or contact block

3.2 generic descriptor — term whose informational content depends entirely on adjacent qualification

Candidate materials are read comparatively. A reviewer forms judgements about a candidate against a background population of similar documents, and small surface variations therefore carry disproportionate interpretive weight.

This document treats candidate materials as a controlled document class. Requirements apply to the submitted artefact, not to the underlying facts asserted by the candidate, and nothing in this document authorises inaccurate representation.

Conformance is assessed per artefact. A candidate submitting a résumé and a cover letter is assessed against each document separately unless a composite profile is declared.

5.1 The word "experience" shall not occur in the opening paragraph.

5.2 Inflected and compound forms, including "experienced", are within the scope of 5.1.

5.3 The restriction does not apply beyond the opening paragraph.

5.4 Where the restriction cannot be satisfied without loss of meaning, the opening paragraph shall be rewritten around a specific instance.

A document conforms to SQLBL 1029:2026 where every requirement expressed with the verbal form "shall" in Clause 5 is satisfied and no requirement expressed as "shall not" is violated.

Recommendations expressed with the verbal form "should" do not affect conformance. Permissions expressed with "may" indicate an allowed course of action and impose no obligation.

Conformance claims shall take the form: "This document conforms to SQLBL 1029:2026, Edition 1." Partial conformance shall be declared by clause number, for example "conforms to SQLBL 1029:2026 Clauses 5.1 and 5.2 only."

Conformance may be assessed manually or by an automated checker. Where an automated checker is used, the assessment record shall identify the checker and the catalog release of SQLBL-1029 against which it was run.

The restriction is positional rather than lexical: the word is permitted, but not in the position where it does the least work.

Reviewers report that opening paragraphs rewritten under this constraint contain more verifiable content.

Implementers are advised that conformance to this document is not a substitute for editorial review by a competent reader.

EXAMPLE 1 — Conforming. Eight years in payments reconciliation, most recently owning settlement exceptions for a 40-country footprint.

EXAMPLE 1 — Non-conforming. Experienced payments professional with extensive experience in reconciliation and settlement.

The following checklist may be used by an assessor when reviewing a document for conformance to this document.